Notice: Undefined index: HTTP_REFERER in /home/stparch/public_html/headmid_temp_main.php on line 4394
Newspaper Archive of
Sedona Red Rock News
Sedona, Arizona
January 13, 2010     Sedona Red Rock News
PAGE 4     (4 of 22 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
 
PAGE 4     (4 of 22 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
January 13, 2010
 
Newspaper Archive of Sedona Red Rock News produced by SmallTownPapers, Inc.
Website © 2026. All content copyrighted. Copyright Information
Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Request Content Removal | About / FAQ | Get Acrobat Reader




4A- RED ROCK NEWS, Sedona, AriZona Wednesday, January 13, 2009 ION Verniers kind heart ? created positive image for city cops Jan. 15, when Sedona Police Chief Joe retires. , Vernier announced his retirement Nov. 23 years with the city of Sedona. Sedona loses another community leader Friday, Vernier after 10 City Manager Tim Emster, a newcomer himself to the city, is faced with the job of replacing a man who not only led the police department but who related personally to his officers and community members. Vernier not only knows each of his officers by their first name, but he can tell anyone the names of the officers' spouses, their children and their pets, according to SPD Cmdr. Ron Wheeler. I experienced Vernier's personable nature firsthand while working with him when I was the city reporter for the Sedona Red Rock News. During our first meeting, he gave me his cellphone number and told me to call whenever I needed anything. Later, he shared a very intimate moment of his life with me when he told me the story of the heart attack he suffered while mountain biking in Sedona just a few years ago. When I needed his help, he proved he was a man of his word. I'd received menacing phone calls from a reader that caused some alarm on my part. I imme- diately called Vernier, who assured me the police department would take care of it, which it did. Vernier's softer side contrasts starkly with the stereotypical "tough guy" cop image, which in turn strengthened the department's image in the community. Ernster has a tough job ahead of him trying to find a candidate who can embody even part of what Vernier represents in this city. The city will celebrate Vernier's retirement with an open house Thursday, Jan. 14, at City Hall from 4 to 6 p.m. where staff, elected officials and residents can thank him for his service to the community. We also thank Vernier for his dedication and wish him the best in his next adventure. -- Trista Steers News Editor The Sedona "Opinion" Red Rock News P.O. Box 619 Sedona, AZ 86339 The Voice of Sedona and Oak Creek Canyon for more than 45 years ' x"~ ~. Publisher: Robert B. Larson THE SEDONA RED ROCK NEWS (ISSN 1044-7555) is published twice a week on Wednesday and Friday for $39 per year local by Larson Newspapers, LLC. 298 Van Deren, Sedona, Ariz Periodical postage paid at Sedona, Ariz. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to SEDONA RED ROCK NEWS, P. O. Box 619, Sedona, AZ 86339-0619 Keep Posted with Sedona's Award-Winning Newspaper Member of Arizona Newspapers Assn. & National Newspaper Assn. The entire contents of all Larson Newspapers publications, including the " Sedona Red Rock News, the Cottonwood Journal Extra, The Camp Verde Journal and their Web sites are 2009 by Larson Newspaper~ No portion produced by Larson Newspapers may be reproduced or reprinted in whole or part by any means without the express written permission of the publisher or managing editor of Larson Newspapers: 'I0 Sedona RED ROCK NEWS to the Editor Servers donate to Sedona's food bank All of the servers at the Coffee Pot Restaurant are to be highly commended. I was impressed with the Coffee Pot Restaurant when they kept their doors open after hours during the Christmas holiday to serve free meals to anyone in the commu- nity who wanted a free holiday meal. I was overwhelmed when the Sedona Community Food Bank received a dona- tion from all the servers who selflessly gave their time and donated all their tips from one entire day. Although other restaurants in our community have generously donated in other forms, since I have been serving as a food bank volunteer, to the best of my knowledge, this is the first time that a group such as this has monetarily sacrificed a full day of the major part of their income for the welfare of the needy in our community. The thought, effort and sacrifice involved in this donation not only go above and beyond the spirit of Christmas but exem- plify a sense of community which all of us can be proud of. Kay Amalfitano Sedona Community Food Bank volunteer Postmaster made my Christmas twice While enjoying my coffee on Christmas morning the telephone rang. The voice on the line" identified himself as Dave Cartlidge, postmaster for Sedona. He said that he had stopped by the post office to see what his workload would be like for the day after Christmas and found some undelivered Christmas gifts and one had my name on it. I replied that this sounded jtlst like a conver- sation he and I had had a year ago. He said that the package was from Martin Greenberg, and I replied, "Oh, that's the other son." This postmaster is very modest and will deny that he'did anything special. I would like to acknowledge him for making my day special [two years in a row] as I am certain is the case for the other folks that he made calls to. Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus, and he lives right here iff Sedona. Thank you, Dave Cartlidge, for contrib- uting to the charm of our small-town feeling. Pinky Greenberg Sedona As the campaign season heats up, we may hear opinions about the streetlights in West Sedona. Here are some facts for your consideration. Some candidates and others continue to tell us that lights will destroy our dark skies and are not necessary for pedestrian safety. Not so. Consider the following: The International Dark- Sky Association wrote us by e-mail Dec. 19, '" Quality lighting projects can actually enhance the community's ability to successfully apply for the IDSC [International Dark-Sky Community designation]." And, Sedona already has signifi- cant pedestrian street lighting in use. According Guest to John Harper, Perspective Arizona Department of Transportation MARK Fla.gstaff District engrneer, there are DINUNII0 95 lights installed on State Route 179 from Canyon Road north to the 'Y' roundabouts. "We will have the following from Canyon north: 72 15-foot tall 150-watt pedestrian lights and 23 30-foot tall 250-watt roundabout lights. Total 95. Average is about 2.0 foot-candles for the 'Y' and the pedestrian lights." Eighty-six lights are already installed, Harper'wrote in an e-mail. Folks, we will have 95 dark- sky compliant lights on State Route 179 and the 'Y' in about half of a mile. What is your experience in that lighted area? Any glow or glare? Is your peripheral vision improved? When traveling through the roundabouts at the 'Y,' do you have good visibility? Can you see the sidewalks and pedes- trians? There are 14 light poles that are 30-feet tall in about 100 yards. Does it seem like "the Las Vegas Strip" as some groups predict for West Sedona? How is your visibility on State Route 179 compared to State Route 89A? How is your depth perception? The proposed lights on 89A will have taller poles [maybe 35 feet], but the light output is expected to average as low as 1.2 candlepower, significantly less than what the 95 lights on 179 and the "Y" are emitting. "The [SR] 179 lights are nearly twice as bright as the ones we're proposing for SR89A," Harper wrote. There will be fewer lights over a longer distance. Also, opponents to streetlights have distorted pedestrian safety, the primary issue that ADOT is addressing on 89A, a significant commercial corridor. Activity doesn't stop at night. Are street lights really unexpected in such a commercial corridor? This issue is not about reducing vehicle accidents and fender- benders. Rather, it's about improving night- time visibility for drivers and pedestrians. It is not about dark skies, it is about dark ground. Due to' poor visibility, there have been multiple pedes- trian deaths, the loss of human life. To use daytime vehicle accident rate statistics to try to discredit the effectiveness of lights at night not only sorely misses the point, it minimizes the cata- strophic severity of a lost life. A broken headlight does not equal a broken human being. ADOT doesn't think so. Do you? Should others? This darkness safety issue has been in front of ADOT for four long years. In August 2006 ADOT presented the city with its conclusion that visibility needed to be improved on 89A through continuous lighting. In August 2007 ADOT proposed installing 76 Dark-Sky Compliant streetlights. The Sedona City Council agreed [7-0] to support improved visibility through lighting, then reversed itself at a subsequent meeting and formed a safety panel to explore alter- natives to lighting. ADOT participated with resi- dents and city staff throughout the safety panel process. When the panel's final recommenda- tions were reached in early 2008, ADOT immediately wrote to the city on April 15, 2008, clearly stating its position that it would agree to the recom- mended package of alternatives to lighting as follows: "ADOT is agreeing to this compromise solution only if the median and pedestrian barriers are include l for the remainder of the study area [89.A corridor] The median and pedestrian barriers should mitigate the potential nighttime pedestrian crossing in the segments without continuous roadway lighting. In areas where there is no median or pedestrian barrier, these segments will have lighting." ADOT's position was clear. Medians and/or barriers could be used tO block pedestrians from crossing. Where there were no medians and/or barriers, there must be lighting. The primary focus remained intact. Increased visibility for pedestrians and drivers was not to be compromised. Some still argue that ADOT had agreed to legs than contin- uous medians. There is no docu- mentation that ADOT approved "strategic location" of medians. There is documentation that ADOT wanted medians or lights along the entire two miles of highway. ADOT made it clear that it had secured funding for lights, but not for alternatives, which would likely include round- abouts at a significantly greater expense. Without ADOT's funding, the city would bear the entire cost of the alternatives to lights. In June 2008, the City Council considered the panel's recommendations but did not approve the option of the total alternative package. Rather, they wanted ADOT to imple- ment a partial solution that did not solve the problem that ADOT had identified 2 years earlier, i.e "improved driver and pedestrian visibility and safety over the dark two miles from Dry Creek Road to Airport Road." In response to a subsequent city inquiry into possible compromise options that ADOT might agree to, ADOT wrote the city onAug. 12, 2008, again outlining its position regarding lights and alternatives. ADOT encouraged the city to accept the package of alternatives or consider taking over responsi- bility for thetwo-mile segment of the highway. That letter is part of the record of the Aug. 13, 2008, council meeting. At that Aug. 13, 2008, council meeting, it became clear to a majority of council members that the city's expense for the alternative to lights was finan- cially prohibitive. The council voted 4-2 to once Editor's Note: The Sedona Red Rock News verified the quotes Sedona City Councilman Mark DiNunzio provided with documents written by International Dark- Sky Association Programs Director Kim Patten, Arizona Department of Transportation Flagstaff District Engineer John Harper arid council communications from former Sedona City Manager Eric Levitt again support ADOT's original proposal to improve visibility. ADOT retains responsibility for the road, its maintenance and financial liability. The city, with resident input, is participating in the selection of the design of the lights. As you form your position on 89A safety and whether you agree with ADOT and your City Council, please ask yourselves these questions: Was it a financiallyprudent decision for the city? Will ground visibility improve? Will safety for pedestrians and drivers improve? Will Sedona still have dark skies? Was it the right decision for Sedonans and our visitors who travel at night? Are the streetlights on 179 and in Uptown an effective improvement? Please know that councilors made the lighting decision despite being subjected to some verbal and "personal affronts by some opponents, a behavior that continues to this day. These city councilors have served us with grace and courage on this issue. In so doing, they have set an example for us that reminds us all that how we conduct ourselves personally is a major ingredient, perhaps the most important one, as we work together to keep Sedona beautiful. I am honored to serve with them. These comments are mine alone and not necessarily the opinion or position of the city of Sedona or the City Council. Mark DiNunzio is a current member of the Sedona City Council. He is not standing for election. A